Reviewing 5E D&D Monsters - Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes, Pt 2 (Demons)

Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes gives us almost two dozen new fiends spread across the factions of Demons, Devils and Yugoloths, and even more than that if you consider the demon lords and archdevils that were given statblocks in the book. Being perhaps the biggest sourcebook about the Blood War in 5th Edition -- and the unlikelihood that we're ever going to get a proper 'demonomicon' style sourcebook in 5E -- it's the biggest fiend lore addition we get to the 5th Edition cosmology. 

And while Monsters of the Multiverse does a similar thing to the 2024 Monster Manual in splitting apart the 'demon' and 'devil' monster groups and arranged everyone alphabetically, I find it much easier to talk about the fiends in one go. So just like how it was in my original Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes review, the demons will have one article, and then the devils and yugoloths get another article, before we go on with the rest of the book. 

As per my what I've been saying in previous posts in my revival of the D&D 5th Edition monster reviews, I am not going to talk about named entities here. The Demon Lords almost made it in because some of them have pretty neat designs (well, mostly Demogorgon, Juiblex and Zuggtmoy) but as a whole, it makes the production of these articles much easier. As I found out during the process of writing and editing, I just don't really care that much to have such a huge chunk of the monster review be me regurgitating the history of the character (which wikis and sourcebooks do much better) as compared to talking about the fantasy biology and abilities of more 'common' creatures. 

This part contains all the variations of the Tanar'ri Demons introduced, which are the Chaotic Evil ones that want to spread wanton destruction and everything. I covered much more about the Demons in D&D here. 

• Click here for the previous part. 
• Click here for the next part.
• Click here for the index.

[Originally published June 2020; Revised on May 2026]

____________________________________________________

Demons - Alkilith 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 11

The Alkilith is an obscure demon that originally debuted in bonus material for 2nd Edition's Planescape setting, and briefly showed up in 3E's Fiend Folio as a heavily retooled version of itself. And when selecting from the dozens of demons available from D&D's history, Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes decided, rightfully so, that this rather obscure gate-fungus demon is what they needed. And I really like it! It is such a stark contrast to all of the monstrous animal-people that D&D has been using for their demons. 

The Alkilith, at first glance, doesn't look like a demon. It doesn't even look like a proper monster, being instead a foul fungal growth that only manifests on 'apertures'. This could be doorways, windows and anything that looks like a portal. From the artwork of both 2E and 5E, the mossy material really does look nasty but ultimately innocuous, save for the random, mismatched glowing red demon eyes. Which, I assume, the Alkilith can just close. 

Whenever Alkiliths take root (or whatever the correct terminology is for demonic tanar'ri moss), however, they weaken the fabric of reality, and turn that gateway into a demonic portal for other demons to come through. The concept of 'demon gates' is a pretty simple one that has proven to be quite effective, particularly in video games. Hi, Oblivion! But the Alkilith gives the option of making that demon gate into its own, sentient demon. Which, in a way, makes complete sense that some of these fiends are adapted into actually functioning as portals. 

A lot of great description about the Alkilith, too. Quoth Mordenkainen: "The appearance of an Alkilith in the world heralds a great wrongness and imminent catastrophe." This transformation takes a bit of time (anywhere from 6 to 36 days), as the Alkilith needs to anchor itself and attune the gateway to the Abyss, but if we are being honest... who, really, is going to look at some fast-growing moss and think 'oh, a demon portal' instead of calling the cleaner's?  

Combat-wise, despite having a very respectable 11 Challenge Rating, the Alkilith wants to do its job stealthily. I imagine that in a campaign, the Alkilith would have either already turned itself into a portal in the midst of disgorging out demons, or probably trying to create a portal in a location that the adventurers would realistically visit several times (which would be a nice bit of buildup as they maybe notice the moss, but fail their investigation checks... or if they catch the demon early). In addition to typical ooze-y abilities like spider climb and amorphous form, Alkiliths have resistance against magic and the ability to 'ferment confusion', causing a nasty buzzing in the heads of anyone around it and get some disadvantage. Cleverly, I feel like this is something that could be attributed to like, a moss with poisonous spores or something. The jump from just a weird moss and a portal to the Abyss is deliciously wild.

We also get some nods to the 3.5E version of the Alkilith, as 5E's Alkilith agrees with 3.5E's origin that the Alkliliths are spawned off of the body of the ooze demon lord Juiblex. Juiblex was also statted out in Tome of Foes! 3.5E, which doesn't really like 'ambient' monsters, turns its take on the Alkilith into a pollution ooze demon. Which is, by the way, a very cool concept of its own, but it's not anywhere as weird as a moss gateway to hell. Interestingly, Tome of Foes notes that Alkiliths must find escape routes out of the Abyss into the Material Plane, because 'most cultists consider them too risky to summon'. I highly disagree, the whole point of these nihilistic fantasy cults is that they have absolutely no reservations at going over the line in their worship of their demons! 

____________________________________________________

Demons - Armanite 

• 5.5E/5E: Large Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 7

Debuting in 2E, and featured in the demon-themed books for 3.5E and 4E, the Armanite feels like a pretty simple concept. The regular batch of D&D demons are really a colourful and eclectic bunch compared to more 'serious' demon lineups in games like Doom or Diablo. Which is why I appreciate the options for more dour designs compared to the more colourful Hezrous, Yochlols and Chasmes. (This was why 4E had the 'flayed man' Evistro as the common minion demon instead of the Dretch). 

Armanites in 5E are basically just demonic centaurs, which... isn't the most interesting design, but the artwork does deliver on the aesthetic. It's not an aesthetic that I am particularly fond of, but it does work for a member of a gnashing demonic horde. Some nice details there, like the armour and the horns on the Armanite's head and shoulders. This builds into the fact that Armanites is a walking arsenal of natural weapons, from the whip-like tail, horned heads and taloned fingers. They also have some innate magic, being able to summon lances of lightning. I've heard the Armanite described as 'minotaur-centaurs', which... I can see that. Being classified as large, they are probably larger than a typical non-monstrous centaur. 

The CR 7 Armanite form the role of 'heavy cavalry' among the demonic hordes, and in the blasted field of the Abyss, great herds of these Armanites charge across the fields to do combat with anything and everything. If they can't find foes, they will fight each other. They are meant to be simple, brutish savage minions, and that's okay. I don't really have a ton to say about that otherwise, but they make a nice alternate option for a lesser demon to menace lower-leveled parties and I do like options. 

____________________________________________________

Demons - Bulezau 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 3

The Bulezau is also a very 'classic mythology' looking demon, being obviously based on the real-world iconographies of goat-man demon Baphomet (unlike D&D's take on the demon, who is more of a minotaur-man). And at CR 3, the Bulezau is, again, quite suited to pad out the lower ranks of the demons while having that classical demonic feel. 

Just being a creepy goat-man isn't quite interesting, though, as cool as that squatting art of the Bulezau is. They are given the additional gimmick of a disease demon as well. They have a 'rotting presence' due to their disfiguring ailments, inflicting damage to anyone around them. Their barbed tail is also laced with a flesh-rotting poison that reduces your hit point maximum. As the description notes, 'crusted eyes, maggots wriggling in open sores and a reek of rotten meat'. 

That disease bit is just a small portion of what the Bulezaus are, though. They are not just manifestations of disease, but also that of animalistic rage. They are demons, after all, and lower-ranked ones at that. Bulezaus lurk in canyons and crags, and are happy to serve as footsoldiers in the Abyss's wars. They crave violence, they want to kill, and if not corralled into battle, they gather into scrabbing, wrestling mobs. Which probably is going to spread all those pestilent, purulent diseases.

This is basically the same characterization that the Armanite has, sure, but I do think that Tome of Foes does really want to pad out the lower ranks of the demons. Demons being more 'chaotic evil' and less rigidly defined by society means that there really should be a lot more weaker, weirder demons running around. And having some nice, single-digit CR options with a more traditional look is a nice little cast expansion for the D&D demons. 

(To note, in the 5E Monster Manual, not counting 'fodders' like Dretches and Manes, we have tiny spy Imp, shadow-monster Shadow Demon, gorilla-man Barlgura, toad-man Hezrou, mosquito-man Chasme and bird-man Vrock... none of which really looks properly demonic until we hit the CR 9 Glabrezu). 

____________________________________________________

Demons - Dybbuk 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 4

Oh! One of my favourite demons from this book is the Dybbuk. Borrowing its name from a possessing spirit from Jewish mythology, the Dybbuk is reinterpreted in Dungeons & Dragons as a demon that possesses corpses. The 5th Edition artwork only shows the reanimated corpse, but both the description and older 3E material show the Dybbuk in its true form -- a ghostly jellyfish. But not just a mere jellyfish, but one whose features are contorted into a scowling face. That right there makes it so much more charming and disturbing as a monster. 

A Dybbuk's entire deal is its 'violate corpse' ability, puppeteering the corpse from within and using it to 'engage in a range of sordid activities'. Which the statblock and flavour text give several examples of, inspired by classic horror movies -- vomiting gouts of blood, excreting piles of squirming maggots, twisting its head all the way around, or contorting their limb to scuttle on the ground. Typical Exorcist stuff. I am not really sure what the main point of this is, other than typical chaos and spreading of fear, the Dybbuks are just dicks, I suppose!

When they initially enter the Material Plane, or if their 'host' corpse is destroyed, the Dybbuk is forced to travel in their natural jellyfish form, which is incorporeal and ghostly. Dybbuks don't like to travel in this form, and they look for nearby corpses to take over. The Dybbuk has several natural spells (Fear, Dimension Door, Phantasmal Force) which in the original Tome of Foes printing it can only use in its natural form; but the Monsters of the Multiverse reprint rephrases this so that the Dybbuk can utilize these spells from within the corpse.

That bit does make the Dybbuk a bit more interesting since the zombie corpse has a combative purpose, being a 'shield' to protect its true form. Again, it's okay, I suppose, for Dybbuks to be just possessing corpses for the shits and giggles, but considering that as written, it's not going around killing people, or creating more Dybbuks somehow, or extracting souls, it feels a bit weird to want to understand what Dybbuks are meant to accomplish other than just being a creepy encounter. 

One last thing to note that isn't represented in 5th Edition but was in the Dybbuk's original 3E debut is that Dybbuks are from a different sub-race of demons called the 'Loumara' (as opposed to 'Baatezu', which comprises of almost all the other demons). Loumaras are supposed to be more ghostly, spirit-like demons that are born out of 'dreams of dead gods' in the Abyss. They never really caught on because the others didn't really feel 'demonic', but I am happy that 5th Edition rescued the most memorable of them all, the Dybbuk. 

____________________________________________________

Demons - Maurezhi 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 7

I went on record when I did this review in 2020 that I found the Maurezhi to be one of the least interesting fiends in Tome of Foes. My opinions still hasn't changed, especially since I completely forgot it existed until I opened up my document to work on this article. The Maurezhi sits in a weird spot where it is classified as a demon, but its gimmick revolves around the undead. No, a specific type of undead, the ghouls. Which explains why the Maurezhi's artwork in all its incarnations is just... a ghoul. 5E gives it some really nice detailing, with the pot-belly and the bloodstained claws, but I really wished that they had done something to differentiate the Maurezhi from just a particularly emaciated ghoul. 

It doesn't help, either, that Ghouls already have a 'boss' with a fancier name, being the Ghast. And furthermore, Devourers also exist as this link between undead and demons, and being far more memorable in its gimmick and appearance. Which leaves the poor Maurezhi a bit lacking of identity as a 'demonic ghoul'. 

Maurezhis were created by an exarch of Orcus called Doresain, the King of Ghouls. Doresain turned a bunch of elves into the demonic Maurezhi, giving them super-ghoul powers. Unlike regular ghouls, a Maurezhi's bites and magic resistance works against its fellow elves... an effect that is severely diluted because Ghasts also already have that effect. Maurezhis can also raise fallen ghouls and ghasts, which... also doesn't feel all that special. 

Perhaps the only really cool thing that the Maurezhi can do that isn't just taken from the Ghoul/Ghast statblock is its ability to 'assume form'. The Maurezhi can assume the form of a humanoid that it has eaten, which is creepy and cool... but the disguise only lasts less than a week, at which point the disguise rots and 'sloughs off' like dead skin. That's something, I suppose? It's a nice middle-of-the-road demon for a more undead or Orcus themed session or campaign; but otherwise I'm just not particularly enthused with this one. The Dybbuk or the Devourer really are far, far more interesting if you want to do a 'demon that interacts with the undead' vibe. 

____________________________________________________

Demons - Molydeus 

• 5.5E/5E: Huge Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 21

The Molydeus is a super-powerful demon that debuted in Planescape in 2E, and stands at a whopping CR 21. The very first lines in its Tome of Foes entry is a huge boast, declaring that the Molydeus is 'the most ruthless and dangerous of demons, more feared than the dreaded Balor'. That's strong fighting words! We are doing some power-scaling right here! The Molydeus, by the way, is also notable for being one of the few monsters who didn't receive an artwork in Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes, only getting proper artwork in Mordenkainen's Monsters of the Multiverse. It's... it's not a good start for the Molydeus's 5th Edition career. 

The 12-feet Molydeus is a huge being, standing around the average height of most giants, and has the body layout somewhat similar to a Werewolf. Its humanoid skin is red, but its wolf head and tail are gray. Most importantly, it has got a demonic serpent sprouting from its back. I'm... I'm honestly not the biggest fan of this design visually. A giant wolf-man doesn't really scream 'ultimate demon' to me, and while I understand the thematic significance of the snake looking like it doesn't belong, it still doesn't belong and clashes against the aesthetic of the Molydeus. 

Molydei (that's the plural used in the book) are second only to the Demon Lords, guarding their most precious possessions, enforcing the loyalty of the troops, and bringing death to their masters' enemies. They speak with the authority of their masters... quite literally, because that snake head functions as essentially a monitor and a phone for the Demon Lord. The Demon Lord watches the Molydeus through the snake head, and can even speak through the snake head to tell its wishes.

Demon Lords transform their most loyal, fiercest and cunning minions to the rank of Molydeus through a series of excruciating torments, which ends up being both a blessing and a curse. The might that a Molydeus has is, again, greater than even the mighty Balors. However, they are forever bound to servitude and at the mercies of their Demon Lord, essentially enforcing the fact that this is the cap of their demonic career, enforcing that there is 'no room for treachery' for the Molydeus. Which to me just spells drama! Demons being chaotic evil rage-monsters, on principle would not like to be so constantly observed, let alone have their own ambitions to become Demon Lords themselves dashed. There could be a drama here going on to turn the Molydeus against its master. It is noted that Demon Lords often dispatch Molydei to watch over their Amulet, which would allow them to resurrect in the Abyss even if their form is destroyed.

The Molydeus itself is a pretty simple statblock, but with really high stats. It has legendary resistances, as well as a batch of spells (which includes Polymorph, Lightning Bolt and Imprisonment), and a demonic weapon that is gifted from the Demon Lord. This weapon (the form of the weapon depends on the master) is bound to the Molydeus's soul, and will dissolve into slime if the Molydeus is slain. The weapon gives some bonuses to decapitation, which is such a random and rare trait in 5th Edition. Oh, and the snake head, connected to the Demon Lord, will transform whatever creature it manages to kill into a Manes... which is a fate worse than death, quite literally, since you can't be resurrected or transformed back. 

I do really find the Molydeus's visual design to be a bit too goofy to really take as seriously as they intended it to be, but I appreciate the writeup and the potential drama between a competent (or even loyal) servant and its micromanaging boss. 

____________________________________________________

Demons - Nabassu 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 15

Visually, the Nabassu doesn't really look particularly distinct. A typical 'demonic' body layout, being a jet-black reptilian-skinned humanoid with horns and bat-wings? We've got a bunch of those on the Devil side of the playground. I do like the flavour a fair bit, though! The Nabassu are insatiable hungry demons, and they are driven by that and that alone. If they see a creature that they think they can kill, they will attack and consume it. Standing at a rather powerful CR 15, this means most things. Including other demons, and even other Nabassu. 

Interestingly, this is a bridge too far for the chaotic evil demons, who banish the Nabassu even among demonic hordes in the Abyss. It's not the principle of demon-killing per se, which is a daily occurrence even in the Abyss where demons can't reform. But the act of devouring those souls is a bridge too far. Or, well, I suppose most demons would treat the prospect of their own souls being devoured as the danger instead of other demons. 

Thus, Nabassu live in the fringes of the Abyss, feeding on whatever weak demon or fiend wander into their area. Interestingly, Tome of Foes note that particularly powerful Nabassu will search out the demon lords' amulets, which are the very plot devices guarded by our buddy the Molydeus above. A demon-vs-demon storyline might feature a Nabassu as a wild card, then, perhaps having the information and/or a grudge against a demon lord. 

The way that Tome of Foes suggests using the Nabassu is through an 'infiltrator' hook. Whenever a magic portal or a summoner is trying to get a demon, Nabassus try their best to track this down and get summoned instead, bursting out of the portal to embark on a feast of souls. I've seen the Nabassu used as such, where the adventurers, the cult they are fighting, and the Hezrou lesser demon summoned by the demon had to team up to fight a Nabassu that burst out of the portal. Tome of Foes also suggests that a summoner can keep feeding souls to the Nabassu to keep it satiated, although you know this devious creature is going to betray its summoner the first chance that he gets. 

In addition to devouring souls, Nabassus have a pretty interesting ability where they have an aura that darkens the immediate vicinity around it. It's 'eating' the light, I think, is the intended effect. It also has a 'soul-stealing gaze', where its gaze will drain life from an enemy, and if they are slain this way, gets transformed into a Ghoul -- an undead of ravenous hunger itself. Actually, everything about the Nabassu makes it a far, far more interesting 'Ghoul Lord' than the Maurezhi, doesn't it? 

The idea of a demon that is the 'demon to the demons' is an interesting one, and mechanically I actually like the Nabassu. I really wished the design was a bit more impressive for such an otherwise interesting concept. Perhaps an emphasis on the 'hunger' part would work a lot better! 

____________________________________________________

Demons - Rutterkin 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 2 (Rutterkin)
• 5E: Medium Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 1/4 (Abyssal Wretch)

Another 'fodder' demon is the Rutterkin, which is a type of 'warped demon', roaming the Abyss in mobs that constantly search for prey to devour. Rutterkins are a step up from Dretches, but still look quite wretched. I actually like the Rutterkin more as the 'common' lowest-ranked-that-is-not-a-Manes Demon, both visually and conceptually, and the 'warped human almost-zoimbie' fits a lot better compared to the Dretch looking like a nightmare muppet. 

The artwork for the Rutterkin has differed a lot from edition to edition, and all of them are valid because all Rutterkins should look a bit different. I have to appreciate the 5E artwork, though. Visible entrails and ribcage, deformed head, the arm and leg on the right side shrunk down and deformed, but a pillar-like blistering left leg, and a right arm that has mutated into a tentacle with a gnashing pair of jaws at the end, surrounded by the remnants of the Rutterkin's fingers. Grody!

Rutterkins actually work as protectors of the Abyss, gathering and surging towards any intruder and unleashing a wave of crippling fear that can stop their victims in their tracks. The Rutterkin will then attempt to bite them and inflict a 'Warping Plague' upon them. This poison inflicts the corrupting influence of the Abyss onto their victim, and they will, if they expire from the poison, be transfigured irreversibly into a monstrous fleshy blob. 

They don't become a Rutterkin, though. They become either an 'Abyssal Wretch', which does not get an artwork but is described as a 'mass' that follow the Rutterkin around, or, in the Monsters of the Multiverse book, just into a Manes. Multiverse just does away with the 'Abyssal Wretch' statblock entirely to simplify matters, but I really like the idea of the Rutterkin warping you into a much more Resident-Evil-flesh-blob lesser demon instead of 'just' a Manes. 

It is pretty neat, though, and the Rutterkin serves for a much cooler 'footsoldier' minion for a demon incursion scene with its ability to not just merely kill all the commoners and civilians, but warp them, body and soul, into something wrong. 

____________________________________________________

Demons - Sibriex 

• 5.5E/5E: Huge Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 18

Oh, yes. Speaking of body horror, we've got the monstrous elder demon known as the Sibriex. The Sibriex has always had a lot of gloriously gory artwork, and while D&D as a whole has moved away from a lot of the gorier designs, I am surprised the Sibriex made it into 5th Edition, and if anything, with a lot more blood, pus and viscera in its design compared to its previous incarnations. I am always a fan of the giant multi-bulbed brain, the beady eyes and the unhinged mouth of 3E's Sibriex, but the 5E one with so much viscera dripping down its body, and the mass of spiky tumour-structure beneath its mouth... pretty nasty body horror here. 

The Sibriex is a horrifying thing. In addition to being a giant disembodied bulbous, malformed head, it's also held onto the ground with ancient chains. 5E describes them as 'thought to be as old as the Abyss itself', but they stop short at actually explaining the context behind why the Sibriex is chained up and feels so alien even to other demons. See, most of the demons in D&D are part of the Tanar'ri, the dominant race that inhabits the Abyss. The Sibriex, meanwhile, are Obyrith demons -- they are what came before. Whatever the reason, the Obyrith became a dying race and the Tanar'ri took over their part of the Lower Planes... but some, like the Sibriex, remained. Humbled, reduced, chained, but not weakened. 

Sibriexes are noted to haunt remote parts of the Abyss, and are described to 'breed new horrors and apprehend forbidden lore'. Their vile blood, bile and other bodily fluids cascade down the Sibriex's wound-filled body, and this creates a contaminating aura that causes poison to affect anything and everything around it. It probably doesn't matter since the Sibriex are most commonly found in the Abyss, where nothing nice grows anyway, but if they are ever transported into the Material Plane, it probably wouldn't be good for the local environment. 

Sibriexes, being ancient than most of the world, has spent eons amassing information from across the planes, hoarding knowledge that are so useful and obscure that even demon lords would seek them out. Many are cautious in dealing with Sibriexes, however, as they are likely to either be stingy about parceling out their information, or they try to outright manipulate demon lords in the guise of acting as an advisor. 

In combat, Sibriexes can fight in several ways. It has spellcasting abilities (mostly those that affect the mind), the ability to squirt poisonous bile, and manipulation of those chains. However, the Sibriex's marquee ability is 'Warp Creature', where they target multiple creatures around it and 'warp' their flesh. As per the base statblock, those affected by the Sibriex's influence slowly gain exhaustion, and after several ticks of this ability, they transform into an Abyssal Wretch (or a Manes in Multiverse). 

That's the boring way to run a 5th Edition Sibriex. The cooler version is to respect the flavour of the Sibriex as 'Demon Grafters'. Being in-tune with the Abyss, Sibriexes can create new demons from other creatures, and are identified as being associated and being able to create Rutterkins. Demons petition Sibriexes for physical gifts, and they are able, if they are inclined to, graft body parts to give a demon's greater strength, vision, stamina or other abilities. In exchange for a service or treasure, of course. 

And it is this flesh-warping ability that the Sibriex uses against your players, and exhaustion is so lame and uninteresting tied to this lore. Both Tome of Foes and Multiverse has a d20 table of 'flesh warping' effects, which are unfortunately temporary as the Sibriex's 'Warp Creature' effect ends. This range from beneficial abilities like clawed fingers (which count as daggers), legs becoming long and springy (increasing speed), tentacle fingers (longer reach!) eyes turning black (giving you darkvision), growing another head, a whip-like tail, or growing functional wings (could be from your back... or your ears turn into wings). And some are just cosmetic, like changing the colour of hair/eyes/skin, or giving you tusks. 

But some of the other effects on the Sibriex's table are just hilarious to imagine. 'The target's eyes push out of its head at the end of stalks.' 'The target's arms and legs switch places, preventing movement unless it crawls'. 'The target's ears tear free from its head and scurry away. The target is deafened.' Honestly, I could easily make up a full 100 options, both for beneficial and detrimental, body horror effects for the Sibriex. 

There's a lot that I find cool about the Sibriex. The flesh-warping is one thing. The visuals are another. But the idea of something so ancient that it predates even the demons in the Abyss, that have such deep, long-reaching information... but you have to deal with... well, with that? You also know they're not just there in their remote retreats doing nothing. They're probably plotting, experimenting, doing something unpleasant. There's just something so well-executed about how wrong the Sibriexes feel, and that's a great thing in my books.

____________________________________________________

Demons - Wastrilith 

• 5.5E/5E: Large Fiend - Demon; Chaotic Evil; CR 13

I remembered distinctly that the 3rd Edition's Fiend Folio featured an illustration with three or four serpentine aquatic demons. That's a bit much, isn't it? Not that more variations isn't welcome, but I really shouldn't invalidate aquatic demon plots. Whether your adventurers are helping a Merfolk society deal with demonic invaders, or if they are in what passes for oceans in the Abyss, the 'Water Lords' known as the Wastrilith are there, waiting. 

Design-wise, the Wastrilith's body layout is relatively simple, following that 'Yuan-ti Abomination' body layout of having a snake's (well, eel's) body with a humanoid torso and arms. The Wastrilith gets to be a lot more colourful, though, with a fish head, hooks for arms, and a whole mass of random leaf-like fins that sprout all over his body. I particularly like the detailing of that colourful flow of scales running down the Wastrilith's flank. 

Wastriliths are, surprise surprise, very powerful combatants in aquatic environments. They are able to create an undertow that makes it hard for non-finned creatures to swim through, and they are able to launch spouts of pressurized water in addition to its brute strength. But the Wastrilith's primary gimmick is the ability to corrupt water. Even when the Wastrilith travels on land, its influence will befoul water and taint it, causing it to adapt to the Wastrilith's commands.

But the most devious ability of this corrupted water is that anyone that drinks this water risks their very souls, being described as either withering until they die; or becoming a thrall of the Wastrilith. Rather oddly, in-game only the first 'poisonous' effect is represented, and instead of the cooler mind-control ability, the stat block notes that the corrupted water will heal demons that drink from it. Still a cool ability, but why can't the corrupted water do all three effects? It should do all three effects. 

Not the most memorable demon, if we're being honest, but it does what it needs to do, and the idea of a storyline involving the corruption of water sources and turning them into a 'fountain of health' for demons is a neat one. I also like the potential storyline of the Wastrilith managing to corrupt an entire riverside or seaside town, turning everyone there into thralls insidiously because they drank some corrupted water. 

Wonder Man S01E04 Review: Five Seconds of Fame

Wonder Man S01E04 Review: Five Seconds of Fame

And... I'm not sure this needed to be a whole episode? The 'Doorman Clause' was brought up in previous episodes, and this episode shows it in full detail. It's a simple episode about DeMarr Davis, a bar doorman working in Hollywood who ends up getting superpowers that allow him to create portals. 

We see his rise from a humble dude that ended up rescuing a club on fire, to a brief movie star, and then to a catchphrase-filled one-note pony struggling to make a living both financially and creatively. He then ends up doing a second movie, and during the filming of the movie his powers end up causing a mishap as his co-star Josh Gad jumps into him and never comes out of the other side. This leads to the Doorman Clause, which prohibits individuals from superpowers from working in movies. 

It's a nice standalone episode and story, and a bit tragic, but... Davis is a bit of a flat character, and the 'ding-dong' joke was a bit stale and they repeated it a fair bit. With us already knowing that some tragedy was going to happen, it also kind of happened a bit abruptly and makes the whole episode feel a bit empty in a way -- and I felt like the episode doesn't quite have enough pathos to really contrast the comedic elements the way the rest of Wonder Man did.

Again, though, without the rest of the fantastic cast of Wonder Man, this episode has the rather unenviable task of keeping my attention while featuring a character whose fate we could basically guess thanks to context clues of previous episodes, and it just feels like an overly-long and oddly placed flashback episode that isn't really necessary in this series. 

Marvel Easter Eggs Corner:

• Doorman, a.k.a. DeMarr Davis, is a minor superhero first appearing in West Coast Avengers. He's a mutant that signed up to join the Great Lakes Avengers, who was a bit of a 'parody' team that rivalled and later worked alongside the two real Avengers teams. Doorman had the power to teleport others through the Darkforce Dimension. 
• Doorman wears a mask similar to his comic-book counterpart, although the rest of his character's superhero getup is a more urban trenchcoat.
• Roxxon, the corrupt oil company featured in the MCU in the Iron Man movies and the Cloak and Dagger show, is mentioned as being the corrupt company behind the faulty products Doorman was promoting. 

Announcement - Semi Hiatus

Real life caught up to me, and I am going to be on an indefinite hiatus on this blog for the next couple of months. Really don't have time to review and catch up to new shows, nor do I have time to write too many long-form articles.

At the very least, though, I have written a fair amount of things that have been scheduled to be uploaded. The following review series will still be going on:

• Dungeons & Dragons: Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes has more or less been completed, and will still be uploaded every weekend. That, I think, will be the bulk of the content you guys get to see in the upcoming months. I may get some additional stuff written for D&D's AD&D Monstrous Manual or other collections of adventures finalized and edited as well. 
• Marvel's Wonder Man has been reviewed to the last episode, as is Marvel Zombies, and have also been scheduled.
• I also have three 'reviewing monsters' articles, one for the Genshin Impact's Nod-Krai and another two for Undertale, ready to be released at some point. 

In addition, I have a full playthrough of Pokemon Mystery Dungeon DX that's been scribbled but not properly edited or formatted, and those might be published in June or July. 

There's also the less-exciting CW superhero show season reviews and 'reviewing Pokemon attacks' -- some of which have been sitting in my drafts since last year -- some of which I just need to spellcheck and edit (which GPT is good at, but I don't like shoving my work into GPT... but it will be helpful with a 'fix only spelling and grammar, do not change a single piece of the content' prompt).

Other than that, content in this blog will be very dry -- especially for 'new' and 'live' series, like the One Piece manga, or anything that I haven't watched (Daredevil: Born Again, the One Piece live-action, the new Bleach or JoJo...) and however those reviews will look like will depend on how I feel when I get to actually watching them. 

(I did read One Piece 1181, it sure is a cool action chapter!)

TL;DR, there will be a buffer of posts coming up in the next couple of months, but that's mostly about it from me until August. Bit of a bummer, but life gets in the way and I'll see you guys then!

Pokopia!

 
So I think I need to write a bit about Pokopia, the new sensation hitting all of your Switch 2's, and one of the few reasons to actually even buy a Switch 2 at the time of writing. 

I wasn't planning to play Pokopia, not until Pokemon Winds and Waves forces me to get a Switch 2 and maybe I'll play it along the side. But things happened, my family is awesome, and I was gifted a Switch 2 and Pokopia. And I've been playing it for quite a bit. On and off. I don't plan to be a completionist about it, since these kinds of 'Animal Crossing' style games are... dangerous for me to be completionist about. But I had so much fun. It was so relaxing, so calming, and the fact that you can just pop in, do some harvesting and building and log off was really nice. 

It's a very charming world where you play as a Ditto masquerading as the cutest little fake-human ever, and I found that to be such a brilliant concept. Making new Pokemon arriving in new habitats as the 'villagers' and certain pokemon teaching you certain moves to help harvest items or transverse the terrain is done extremely well too. The story is... all right, with enough 'main story' questlines going around to hold your attention without deviating from the theme of the game and its chiller tone. 

Again, I'm not the biggest fan of the 'blocks' world popularized by Minecraft, but I feel like it's pretty important to do that for this game's playstyle specifically. Really adore the playerable Ditto's "human" form, and how charming the rubber-hose-arm animations are. 

I think it was obvious and not that much of a spoiler that Pokopia takes place in a post-apocalyptic Kanto. It gets a bit more obvious as you start building Pokemon Centers and travel from the first area to the second one, but I thought that coming in without expectations and only minimal spoilers, the build-up to this mystery is done quite well, and the Planet of the Apes style 'oh, this isn't just any post-apocalyptic world, it's Kanto' is a neat little nod to the players without actually being super relevant for the in-universe Pokemon characters. 

There are a fair bit of nice notes scattered all over the land to showcase this plot progression, but that's just collectibles! The main aspect of the game is to solve the problems of your Pokemon friends, make good habitats, scavenge or craft nice little decorations and give them to your Pokemon tenants. That's nice. That's simple. And Pokemon's quite great for the 'gotta catch em all' mentality of the tenants as well. Love that Ditto just carries around a Pokedex, too, which doesn't just record Pokemon data but also habitat data. So much of Ditto's mannerisms is just adorable and well done, and... and I don't think a let's play would be particularly entertaining with me going 'oh god that's cute' and 'oh god that's funny' over and over again. 

Dialogue is simple -- but very fun. Just like Mystery Dungeon, it's always great to see Pokemon have personalities and voices of their own. Vespiquen is more regal, Slowpoke is slow, Timburr is excited about building, Magikarp is a surprisingly peppy dudebro... there are certain unique NPCs as well, like 'Professor Tangrowth' and I do know that a 'Peakychu', a 'Mosslax' and a bunch of other not-quite-alternate-forms-but-visually-they-are-different characters will show up.  I'm sure they'll be fun, too. 

I was planning to do a let's play to follow up Legends Arceus, but... it's just a bit stressful to try and jot down everything about the game and that is against the spirit of the game, really. I do also want to take it very chill and very on my own pace! But on the flipside, I just wanted to acknowledge that this game exists, that I'm very slowly playing through it, and that it is probably one of the better gaming experiences I've had in a while. It's a great Animal-Crossing-meets-Minecraft game on its own, but it actually feels like a game that's properly built and exists in the Pokemon lore and universe. And that's pretty great. 

Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go back to being a little happy morph-blob and go around vacuuming up sticks and rocks and spitting water to make grass grow. 

Reviewing 5E D&D Monsters - Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes, Pt 1 (Allip to Derro)

And after we have finished up with Volo's Guide to Monsters, we're now covering Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes, one half of the two 'splatbook' bestiaries for Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition that would be released together as Monsters of the Multiverse.

As with Volo's Guide to Monsters, Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes has around half of the book discuss in-depth ore about certain parts of the lore, focusing on several aspects of D&D's multiverse setting, and the second half are the monsters. Instead of focusing purely on several spotlight monsters, however, we get five chapters. Two of these chapters are fun, while the other three are quite bland and honestly quite setting-specific.

The best parts are perhaps the weirder races:

• It's always great to get a whole segment discussing the Blood War between the Demons and the Devils. We get some of this in the original 5th Edition Monster Manual, giving a fair amount of context to the Blood War. There's also an expansive 'who's who' of the Abyss and the Nine Hells, and I'm going to state again here that unlike my original coverage of Tome of Foes, I'm going to skip talking about all the 'named' bosses and save them for another article. 
• The Gith is also a nice chunk of lore, and not being the most familiar with them back when I was covering this book initially in 2020, it's nice to see some more expansion about the cultures of the Githyanki and Githzerai. I still am not the biggest fan of these psionic aliens, but have grown to appreciate them a lot more in the last half-decade. 

The rest of the first half covers the following, though: one chapter for Dwarves, one chapter for Gnomes and Halflings, and one chapter for Elves. The Drow stuff for the elves are all right, I suppose, and kind of obligatory... but so much of that chapter is just discussing a lot about the very specific pantheon in the Forgotten Realms which... really is super-specific and honestly wasn't the most well-presented. I liked the Dwarf segment, particularly with this book probably being the first that highlighted some differences in culture about the various dwarven 'sub-races' that are honestly only there for the players' benefit. And I just don't remember anything at all from the Gnomes/Halfling segment, despite finishing that chunk of the book a day before writing this article.

But anyway, we're here for the monsters. The monsters in this book are a fair bit more scattershot. There is an attempt to give us a bunch of extra Drow and Duergar stats, and a whole lot of bonus fiends, but for the most part I do like Tome of Foes as functioning as a real mix-bag of random creatures. 

There are a lot of new fiends here, and just like my original coverage of Tome of Foes, after the first batch of monsters we'll take a detour to talk about Demons, Devils and Yugoloths in two pages and then move on to the rest of the book. 

• Click here for the final part.
• Click here for the next part.
• Click here for the index.

[Originally published May 2020; revised on April 2026]

____________________________________________________

Allip 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Undead; Neutral Evil; CR 5

The first Dungeons & Dragons bestiary I read was the 3.5th Edition Monster Manual, which featured the Allip as one of the monsters in the book. And the artwork is a relatively simple monster concept: a wraith made up of swirling smoke and cloth, with proportions that are just a bit off for a regular humanoid body structure. This artwork stuck with me for quite a while, even if the lore associated with the Allip is quite simple -- someone driven to suicide by madness, and now haunts those who tormented it in life. This does really overlap a lot with other undead like Revenants (vengeance) and Ghosts (unfinished business), making the Allip a bit more redundant.

5E's take on the Allip gives it a lot more of an interesting backstory. Allips are created specifically when someone discovers a forbidden secret. Curses tied to the discovery of a secret (such as a demon lord's name) may be annihilated by the secret and be transformed into an Allip, a combination of the fragments of the victim's shattered psyche and the overwhelming psychic agony. It is such a great twist on the 'forbidden secret' trope, and with how much D&D draws from Lovecraft, this tie-in to 'forbidden secrets drives you mad' is a lot more appropriate for fantasy than the rather oversimplification of mental illness and suicide that the original Allip is. 

Every Allip is wracked with the remnants of the horrifying insight that broke them in the first place, and they are driven by a compulsion to share this secret. They can't say the whole thing, but the whole mess that is the Allip causes even these fragmented chunks of forbidden knowledge to cause temporary insanity in those that hear them. Properly sharing this knowledge (not an easy task due to the Allip's own madness) would allow them to pass on the curse, and a potential encounter with an Allip is for the spectral undead to hide in a library or a wizard's tower, and slowly influencing their minds so that the wizard or scholar produces reams of text that rambles on and on... and within that text is the secret the Allip is trying to pass on. 

Those that survive fighting an Allip but hears its 'howling babble' will often be stuck with a compulsion to learn more about just what knowledge can spawn this hideous being. That bit is probably the coolest (and scariest) part of the 5E Allip, that even after destroying this wretched creature, the adventurers might still be tormented by strange phrases and visions, with the sense that you're meant to know something, if only you know what that something is. 

____________________________________________________

Astral Dreadnought 

• 5.5E/5E: Gargantuan Monstrosity - Titan; Unaligned; CR 21

How cool is the Astral Dreadnought? The first time I saw an Astral Dreadnought, it was neat visually but not the most exciting... until you realize the sheer size of this thing, and the lore that comes with it. The design is pretty simple. A giant serpentine body, two massive crab-claws (actually crab-like in 5E), and a face with a massive fanged maw and a single beady eye. The Astral Dreadnought are titanic beings that live in the Astral Plane, which is both the Dungeons & Dragons universe's version of both a spiritual plane and space. The Astral Dreadnought was famously featured on the cover of the AD&D Manual of the Planes, which explains a lot of the cosmology that D&D is built upon, and somewhat infamously, did not actually appear inside the book. That specific artwork of it was traced and inspired another pillar of sci-fi/fantasy, Doom's Cacodemon. When the two bestiaries of 5E are combined into Monsters of the Multiverse, the Astral Dreadnought is shown looming menacingly on the book's cover.  

Astral Dreadnoughts have existed since the dawn of time, devouring all they encounter. The Dreadnoughts are as big as the largest dragons... or at least, that's what its face and arms are. The serpentine tail 'trails off into the silvery void', a feature that its previous incarnations also seem to share. It gives this being a strange, mythical or reality-warping quality that makes it a lot more mysterious than 'just' a giant alien space kraken. 

Astral Dreadnoughts, by nature, are solitary, and if two Dreadnoughts meet they end up fighting each other. Their eye reflects swirling constellations, but insanity awaits anyone who gazes into the eye of this ancient being. Looking at something as vast and infinite as the Astral Dreadnought causes the sudden realization of mortality. The Astral Dreadnought itself casts an anti-magic field from its eye. It's not commented upon by the prose, but this is the same effect caused by a different creature with a single eye atop a giant mouth -- the Beholder. Is there a real connection, or is it just the game giving a powerful ability to two creatures it wants to hype up?

Astral Dreadnoughts have good enough instincts to track spellcasters and keep them under the gaze of its eye, but it is otherwise a remorseless, indiscriminate hunter. It's not a proper 'organic' being, so anything it eats gets transported into a demiplane (specifically, a demiplanar donjon), a mini-dimension within itself... which mostly just contains eons and eons' worth of corpses and detritus. Which means you can escape the demiplane if you are a powerful enough of a spellcaster to know these planar-teleportation spells...  and also survive being crushed by the Astral Dreadnought's gigantic fangs and claws. It is a unique existence that the Dreadnought goes through, since it doesn't really need sustenance. And yet it is still driven by hunger and the need to feed. When a Dreadnought dies, its demiplane implodes and its contents are released into the Astral Plane, which is an interesting aftermath. In addition to the obvious rescue system, I could see an adventuring hook where we've got spelljamming crews that specialize in taking down Dreadnoughts and then salvaging whatever ancient treasures it has swallowed over the eons. Or, well, a dungeon inside a Dreadnought. 

In addition to being a giant crab-snake monster, the Astral Dreadnought has a couple of extra abilities. It has the property of permanently being tethered to the Astral Plane, unable to leave or be transported away. It can sever 'silver cords', as well -- spellcasters who enter the Astral Space not with a spaceship but by spells like 'astral form' are tethered to their bodies with a silver cord. Astral Dreadnoughts can just cut that. They are also able to unleash psychic blasts, and to temporarily teleport a foe they see into their demiplane, although they get ejected out soon enough if they don't enter through the mouth. 

In the setting of D&D, the Astral Dreadnoughts were created by Tharizdun the Chained God, who specifically sends out the Dreadnoughts to devour planar travelers who seek portals that might lead them to gaze upon gods improperly. I don't know enough about Tharizdun other than what Critical Role has shown me, but it is nice to know just a bit of the Astral Dreadnoughts' backstory.

A very, very cool monster and a really fun concept. Again, the Dreadnought already looked pretty cool in older editions, but the simple slight changes of giving it a pair of proper crab claws instead of two pokey horn-like fingers makes it look so much more menacing. The new mouth also helps too. Iconic for a reason!

____________________________________________________

Balhannoth

• 5.5E/5E: Large Aberration; Chaotic Evil; CR 11

Looking at a bunch of the monsters debuting in Tome of Foes, whoever selected the monsters for this book really liked the 3.5E and 4E material, adapting a lot of the monsters that were highlighted in those two editions' first Monster Manuals. Debuting in the 3rd Edition, the Balhannoth is a creature that I must admit I've never really paid much attention to. It most certainly looked neat, a giant 'slug-blob' monster similar to the Otyugh with a large maw and around a half-dozen tentacles whipping around from its body. 5E made it visually look much more like a mollusk, if not for the monstrous Predator-mouth it has, and the mass of spiky squid tentacles it has. The older versions of the Balhannoth had a bit more mass, I feel. 

It's a neat design, but I had always kind of dismissed it as just a 'tentacle slug monster' before doing the first incarnation of this review article. It doesn't help, though, that the Balhannoth had changed its lore and powers from edition to edition. 3E had it just an Underdark specialized predator that tracks magic and disables them with its tentacles; 4E had them be shifty creatures that can teleport and turn invisible. 5E has the Balhannoth be a Shadowfell native... and have a variation of its 4E power set, but as a service of its main gimmick -- illusions. Or 'altered reality', technically.  

5E Balhannoths are seemingly designed to make full use of its lair. They are able to alter reality within its lair to make the place appear inviting to travelers. They have a limited form of telepathy to scan nearby creatures and alter its lair accordingly. With an intelligence score of 6, it doesn't seem to be properly intelligent, but with this telepathy it can mimic a convincing facsimile of the desires of the people passing by... but it never gets all the details right. Books might be empty, golden items feel like counterfeit, pictures might be indistinct... after all, the Balhannoth is just mimicking for the express purpose of luring travelers to enter its domain out of curiousity. Within its domain, Balhannots can do things like teleport other people around, and warp reality as based on the minds of any other beings that enter it. 

Like most Shadowfell creatures, Balhannoths feed on negative emotions, like fear and despair, and use its ability to teleport short distances or turn invisible to move near its prey,  than grapple them with its mass of tentacles and feed on them. When not lurking in their own lairs, the Balhannoth are sometimes captured by Drow and other sentient Underdark beings and install them on passages as guardians. 

Honestly, having this weird limpet slug monster be such an emotion and mind-reading based opponent is such an unexpected direction to take the Balhannoth, but I for one like it. It gives DMs a nice excuse to describe weird, creepy unexpected locations, which is always a great excuse! It really does elevate the Balhannoth more than its previous incarnations, which always felt like just a random cluster of powers slapped on a tentacle monster and the shrug of 'it's an Underdark predator'. 

____________________________________________________

Berbalang 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Aberration; Neutral Evil; CR 2

The Berbalang draws its name from a mythical creature from Filipino folklore, which tends to behave similarly to the 'ghoul' trope common to many mythologies. In Dungeons & Dragons, the Berbalang debuted as early as the original 1E Fiend Folio, and even then they had written the Berbalang as a being associated with astral projection and the Astral Plane. Which is... unexpected, but there you have it. The Berbalang is depicted as a very 'classic devil' being, with a wiry body, pointy ears, bat wings, and even a goatee in its 5th Edition art. 

Berbalangs are obsessed with gathering secrets, and apparently in 5E they 'creep across the petrified remains of dead gods in the Astral Plane'. That feels a bit overly specific and epic, but okay. They have an obsession with speaking with the dead, whether from the corpses of the dead gods they like so much, or from the bones of dead creatures they have collected. For no real reason other than seeming curiousity, Berbalangs record the stories they obtained from the dead upon the bones of the same creature. 

A Berbalang's main ability is to create an astral projection, and send this spectral Berbalang to other planes, watching the servants of gods and even the gods themselves. While a Berbalang is manipulating this duplicate, their original body is unconscious and can't protect itself. It's an interesting little gimmick, and one that does make the Berbalang an interesting creature to use in a smaller-scale conflict. Being a creature of a measly CR 2, it really does feel like a the whole 'secrets of the dead gods in space' thing feels a bit too epic for it. Tome of Foes ties the Berbalang a bit into one of the species that they are highlighting, fellow Astral Sea dwellers Githyanki, who sometimes hire Berbalangs to spy over their enemies. 

Despite being listed as 'neutral evil', Berbalangs themselves also seem to be just driven by the pursuit of knowledge and not much else. This makes them potential NPCs for a group of players to meet, to ask for information. However, Berbalangs refuse to entertain petitioners unless they come bearing particularly juicy secrets or bones. This makes them a more intelligent and sinister version of the Nothic, I feel, as another secret-obsessed weirdo. 

Overall, the 5E Berbalang interestingly combines aspects of its 1E and 4E incarnation. The 1E Berbalang secludes itself in a cave, and sends its astral projection either to the Astral Plane for 'mysterious' courtship, and in the Material Plane to feed. 4E's Berbalang is a truer-to-real-world-mythology adaptation, simply being a ghoul that feeds on corpses to gain memories from them. Combining all of them into the 5E version is interesting, even if I really do feel like it works better as a creature based on the Material Plane and sending its duplicates to Astral Space. 

____________________________________________________

Boneclaw 

• 5.5E/5E: Large Undead; Chaotic Evil; CR 12

Introduced in the pages of 3.5E's many Monster Manuals, which gave us a lot of fantastic, grisly 'mutated' undead is the Boneclaw. As far as I can tell, however, in its appearances in 3.5E and 4E (it made the first Monster Manual in that edition!), the Boneclaw is 'merely' a particularly vicious undead with the titular bone claws, with some vague mention of oni magic being tied to it. The artwork is consistently cool, though, with sinews around the Boneclaw's lower jaw and large muscles on its arms to lift the three massive claws. I like that little detail that's consistent even as the monster received minor redesigns over the various editions. 

5th Edition kept the basic design of the Boneclaw, but adds quite a bit to it. The Boneclaw is a bit stronger with a lot of stealth-related bonuses and the ability to teleport between shadows, using its long reach to ambush its opponents or to abduct them. The 5E Boneclaw is essentially framed as a 'discount Lich' with its ability to rejuvenate. That alone doesn't make the Boneclaw special, since we've had other undead with a phylactery-adjacent resurrection ability... but the twist with the Boneclaw is really fun. 

The origin story of the Boneclaw is that it was originally a wizard who tried to become a lich... but failed. They are turned into a Boneclaw instead, where instead of an undead master of magic, they get turned into cackling, gibbering undead who are slaves to darkness and hatred. Instead of having its soul migrate into a phylactery, the lack of power causes the would-be lich's soul to migrate and get pulled to a humanoid with "an unusually hate-filled heart". The soul is bonded into the evil of that person, and the Boneclaw becomes forever enslaved to its new master's wishes and whims... both conscious and subconscious. 

This means that the Boneclaw is an unwilling slave to a different evil person, and this is decided by proximity. It could be something as simple as falling into another member of an evil organization, or even one of the evil wizard's minions who now has total control over his old master... but it could just as well be the local bugbear chief, a serial killer rotting in a prison, or just the local town bully. This new person becomes the Boneclaw's anchor, and whenever the Boneclaw is destroyed, it reforms within hours around its master, fully restored. It's far more efficient than Lich or Death Knight or Mummy restoration, with the little problem that Boneclaws don't get to control their actions. 

And this is an interesting conundrum, which Tome of Foes brings up some complications about. Sure, destroying the Boneclaw is as simple as killing (or redeeming!) its evil master. Which, if the Boneclaw is a servile minion to a Big Bad Evil Guy/Gal, it is just essentially another brute that just needs to be taken down. However, a Boneclaw's master might not actually want such a servant or know that it has one, with 'particularly cruel children' being specifically listed as a potential Boneclaw host. This brings in an interesting conundrum, particularly because sometimes the Boneclaw's master doesn't even know they have a sinister guardian that goes around killing people at night that have disagreements with them. And sure, maybe being a cruel child or a town bully isn't the nicest, but most adventuring parties probably won't go around killing them for the crime of accidentally being bound to a Boneclaw that goes around fulfilling their dark impulses, right? It's a lot different than having the Boneclaw's master be an irredeemable serial killer or necromancer or something. 

And this last twist is what makes the Boneclaw particularly interesting to me. It is evil... but it is also an evil that can't be destroyed, and the way to deal with it can be as RP-heavy or not depending on what the story needs. Not a bad change from what was just a spiky ghoul in its original incarnation!

____________________________________________________

Cadaver Collector 

• 5.5E/5E: Large Construct; Lawful Evil; CR 14

This one is a personal favourite ever since I first saw it. Cadaver Collectors are large automatons that resemble rusted figures with lots of spikes on their large dome-like upper body, and as their name implies, they collect corpses. Their artworks are always colourful but creepy, as the Cadaver Collector's back is littered with a lot of weapons and corpses sticking out of it. It's all a fucked-up version of some real-life insects (like the assassin bug), except the Cadaver Collector isn't impaling corpses on its body for camouflage, but as its function. Really like the general design, particularly its jawless face. Really love the mental image of this lurching behemoths wading through the battlefield, slowly, calmly picking up corpses and impaling them on their back like a far, far more morbid trash collector. 

Cadaver Collectors in 5th Edition are ancient beings that can be called by necromancers from the eternal battlefield of Acheron, but many of these necromancers get killed without dismissing the Cadaver Collectors, causing a lot of them to wander the Material Plane. And like all good robots, they just try to do their function to the best of their capabilities. They seek out locations of great battles, and collect corpses. While not mentioned in its 5E writeup, the original 3.5E entry does note that a Cadaver Collector's body collection is most commonly utilized for the creation of undead. 

While Cadaver Collectors would appear to be mostly concerned about just performing their function, they are quite strong threats themselves, able to belch out a paralytic gas. The corpses impaled on their body are also a source of a Cadaver Collector's main combative ability -- it summons the spirits of the corpses as Spectres to help it in battle, a brand new 5E addition that is nicely themed around the Cadaver Collector's association with the undead. 

I really do like this. I am of the opinion that Dungeons & Dragons is enough of a 'kitchen sink fantasy' that robotic beings like Nimblewrights and Warforged shouldn't be a particular problem to find in a D&D setting, but I like it a lot more when there is a nice marriage between sci-fi and fantasy, and having a giant corpse-collecting golem working for necromancers and the undead is a fun one. 

____________________________________________________

Choker 

• 5.5E/5E: Small Aberration; Chaotic Evil; CR 1

Debuting all the way in 1st Edition but languishing in less prominent supplements, I really like the evolution of the Choker from just a weird humanoid with rubber arms to the more monstrous depiction of a noodle-limbed horror in 2E, and ultimately the 3rd Edition design that stuck through 3E, 4E and 5E. A slightly oblong-headed humanoid, with limbs that are clearly not bending properly, and with hands that open up like starfishes into very barb-tipped surfaces. 3E and 5E classified the Choker as an aberration, probably due to the vaguely tentacle-y design it has. 

Chokers are subterranean predators, and their inner skeleton is made up of flexible cartilage instead of bones, allowing them to lurk on ceilings and crevices, but also to slip into narrow fissures like the most screwed-up contortionists. They will place bodies of their previous victims in an easily-visible location, then attack from a secluded location with its long limbs. Their very nasty, jagged palms dig into their prey's neck and they just... well, choke their foes to death. 

A Choker's arm is noted to be long enough that they can just extend their arm out of the crevice, and I do like the surprise of someone seeing a long tentacled limb wrapping around someone's neck. Perhaps it's a creature like an Otyugh or a worm-like creature like the Grick? And then they pull out the monster and it's a weird snarling mutant man. 

A Choker isn't particularly intelligent despite its humanoid appearance, although they are still able to communicate through howls. While most Chokers hunt alone, they do have 'communities', presumably like a troop of apes, that they might be able to warn or summon. I am a bit sad that we don't get any real explanation to its 'aberration' tag, or more descriptions of their biology beyond their hunting tactics. Growing up on 3.5E, I do find the Choker a classic, so I am quite happy to see this starfish-armed weirdo make the jump to 5E. 

____________________________________________________

Clockwork 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Construct; Unaligned; CR 1 (Bronze Scout), 4 (Iron Cobra), 5 (Oaken Bolter), 4 (Stone Defender)

Despite the term being used a lot in the games, I am actually surprised that the 'Clockwork' monster entry is technically brand new for 5th Edition. 'Clockwork Horrors' exist in 2E and 3E, and would be adapted in Spelljammer material for 5th Edition, but that's an always-replicating, ever-expanding mass of spidery robots. These 'Clockworks' are just merely robotic constructs created by gnomes. Setting-agnostic gnome artificer creations, I suppose, without bringing in the whole lore related to tinkerer gnomes from the Eberron setting.

Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes brings in four different Clockwork variations, but most importantly is a delightful pair of tables that lets the DM roll for Enhancements (stealth, self-repairing, enhanced durability, suction feet, a speaker...) which is nice. Far, far more important, however, is the Malfunctions table, which range from simple vulnerabilities to certain types of damage to overheating every other turn, faulty sensors, faulty targeting, 'tank controls' style limited steering, or my favourite, 'imprinting loop' where it keeps identifying each successive new being it sees as its new master. The trope of mechanical robots with malfunctions that translates into wacky hijinks never tire me. 

The lore for the Clockworks are quite generic, but I think it's meant to be beyond 'something something, gnome technology', just so that any setting that needs a Clockwork robot minion can just grab one of these statblocks. Tome of Foes gives us four variations, although the prose makes it clear that a 'Bronze Scout' might look very different depending on the gnome creating them. 

The first is the Bronze Scout, with the art showing us a multi-segmented snake with a fancy toothy beak, wheels with spikes, and two mantis-like arms. Bronze Scouts hide underground while its 'telescoping eyestalks' peek out to look at enemies. There are actually eyes, but they are located quite close to the body in the artwork. Again, it's a scouting unit so it can shoot a bit of lightning, but its primary function ties to its enhanced stealth and perception skills. 

The Iron Cobra is the only one of the four to have had previous incarnations, appearing in 1st Edition's Fiend Folio as a very rare invention of a great magic-user... but has since been reduced to a mere construct in subsequent editions (and a Homonculus sub-type in 4E). 5E's Iron Cobra, being a gnomish clockwork creation, is loaded up with alchemical concoctions, and of course, in addition to all the nonsense that gnomish inventions do, the Iron Cobra's alchemical venom does a random event -- poison, confusion or paralysis. 

The Oaken Bolter is an adorable mobile artillery, looking like a regular ballista on wheels... but by virtue of being listed as a Clockwork, it means that the Oaken Bolter is perfectly capable of moving around on its own. A pretty cool design, and I like the dragon-headed 'face' that the Bolter has. The Oaken Bolter as is shown here is able to swap between three ammunition loadouts: a harpoon to pull in captives, a lightning bolt, or good old explosive TNT. 

And finally, we have a regular mecha in the Stone Defender. Unlike the Shield Guardians, the Stone Defenders guard their charges with two giant stone slabs it holds in its arms. Simplicity! A Stone Defender's special ability, of course, is to intercept attacks, jumping in the way of attacks meant for whoever their master assigns it to guard. But it also has a 'false appearance' trait, giving the hilarious mental image of this one-eyed robot putting its shields up and hiding flush against the wall. 

I wasn't particularly impressed by the Clockworks when I first reviewed them because of the lack of context around them (compared to other constructs like golems, Warforged, Shield Guardians, Helmed Horrors, etc) but I have grown to appreciate them for giving us a nice, convenient statblock to grab just like all the animal and NPC statblocks out there. 

____________________________________________________

Corpse Flower 

• 5.5E/5E: Large Plant; Chaotic Evil; CR 8

A brand-new 5th Edition original, the Corpse Flower is a fun one. I've spoken a couple of times about the lack of variety of 'Plant' monsters in D&D, but we've got a nice, interesting undead-adjacent one here. Sprouting atop the graves and remains of necromancers or other undead creatures, Corpse Flowers grows to enormous size over weeks, and then just tears itself free from the earth and starts shambling around and collect bodies from graveyards and battlefields. 

The artwork shows a pretty nice scale of just a mount of dirt and vines, and the Corpse Flower shambles around on vines thick enough to pick up a human corpse like a toy. In the center of the mass are a bunch of digested skeletal remains, and blooming on top of the flower mound are a bunch of colourful yellow bulbs. I wonder if the corpse of the original necromancer that spawned the Corpse Flower is somewhere deep inside all of that tangled mass? 

Unlike the Cadaver Collector above, the Corpse Flower collects corpses for its own sustenance, as well as to repair itself. The Corpse Flower is also intelligent enough to 'despise the living' and have a 'malevolent bent'. This translates to some interesting abilities. Just like a similar 'corpses as resources' creature we covered a while back, the Devourer, the Corpse Flower's abilities depends on how many corpses it has stashed in its body. Each corpse within the Corpse Flower can be transformed into a zombie minion, or consumed to restore the flower's health as it regenerates from the compost, I suppose. There is some discussion about the corpses it consumes being utterly digested until nothing remains, so there could be a 'we need to recover a corpse of a friend for resurrection' storyline going on here. 

The Corpse Flower is also noted to have a particularly nauseating stench (which also translates to the zombies), which is identified as a defense mechanism that remains even after the flower is dead. Also, there's an interesting bit of flavour text where Corpse Flowers need to be identified, uprooted and burned while it's a seedling that just grew, which isn't relevant to the battle scenarios but I really do like as a world-building detail, where it could just as easily be part of the 'last rites' that people do when they do burial rites. 

____________________________________________________

Deathlock 

• 5.5E/5E: Medium Undead; Neutral Evil; CR 4 (Deathlock), 8 (Mastermind), 3 (Wight)

Deathlocks debuted in 3.5E's Libris Mortis, as a type of undead who is consumed by the magic it wielded in life. There... isn't really that much beyond that. 4E gave almost every monster group three or four variations, and one of the variations of the Wight was a 'Deathlock Wight', which is also a spellcaster. 5E's Deathlock, meanwhile, joins the ranks of many mid-level sentient undead... which I thought is particularly fun because of a simple aspect... someone took a look at 'Deathlock' and 'Warlock', and decided that, hey, the two 'locks should be connected. 

Which, by the way, is a brilliant move. As a pun appreciator, it is one thing, but it does give the Deathlock its identity beyond just being a different undead 'just because'. When a warlock breaks a pact with his powerful patron will have their ticked-off patron transform their corpse into a Deathlock, who is forced to serve its otherworldly patron... as a soulless undead. That is quite a fun tie-in to one of the core classes of the setting. A nice little warning, perhaps, for your warlock players that their patron does not tolerate failure well? 

Tome of Foes also gives another potential origin story, falling in to its original lore that a powerful necromancer might just be able to create a Deathlock through forbidden arts and dark magic, but that's a lot less unique. But whatever the origin is, the Deathlock's mind is warped with an overwhelming compulsion to please its master's desires, whatever they may be. Deathlocks always reflects their patron's interests, in stark contrast to potentially renegade warlocks that might have attempted to defy their much more powerful power sources. 

All Deathlocks have resistance towards Turn Undead, as well as a laundry list of spells. Tome of Foes even gives alternate tables for Deathlocks of the Archfey, Fiend or Great Old One patron, making the statblocks quite modifiable. Two additional Deathlock variants are also introduced here. First is the Deathlock Mastermind, a CR 8 spellcaster with far stronger spells. These Masterminds are given more freedom as their patron lets them devise their own plans and tactics, and often recruit minions to help it complete its goal. Masterminds are still  forever bound loyally to their masters, however. 

And the other one is the much weaker CR 3 Deathlock Wight, which is a weaker version of the base Deathlock, who has a much more reduced spell list and an additional sensitivity to sunlight. This Wight form is a 'special punishment' meted out by the patrons as punishment, denying whatever warlock they want to punish from the powerful spells that they likely sought out the patron for. This undead isn't as interesting as the Allip or Boneclaw on this page, but I have grown to appreciate the Deathlock and the storytelling opportunities it brings. 

____________________________________________________

Derro 

• 5.5E/5E: Small Humanoid; Chaotic Evil; CR 1/4 (Derro), 3 (Derro Savant)

Yeah, I'm not the biggest fan of the Derro. Originating in one of the earliest modules in D&D, the Derro beat out the Duergar as the 'subterranean evil dwarves'. Based off of the Dero ("Detrimental Robots") in Amazing Stories, the Derro of D&D are a race of all the most basic traits that a typical 'evil D&D race' has. Cowardly, superstitious, vicious, shabby, eager to hurt those weaker than them, quick to kowtow under those that are stronger than them. The Derro are individually weak, but turn into a cackling horde when together. As a species, they survive the Underdark due to a combination of their paranoia as well as the high rate of developing sorcerous powers and become 'Savants'. That's, uh... basically the same thing with the Duergar, but with a hobo survival aesthetic instead of goth Norse. 

The Derro is described as 'dwarf-kin', and most dwarves don't recognize them, while Duergar tell of a story of a clan of Duergar left behind when the others rebelled against their Mind Flayer slavers... and became demented and contorted instead. The Derro have their own mythology about their gods and how Diirinka managed to survive with deceitfulness, cruelty and treachery, even at the cost of his sibling. In some older editions, Derro are just... a race of mad Underdark species.

Cut out from Monsters of the Multiverse is a table insisting that all Derro suffers from a type of madness that manifests in strange tics, giving us a massive table with... honestly, a bunch of traits that feels less 'madness' and more 'weird social behaviour'. I really don't think "frets with hair or mustache" or "breathes loudly" is particularly crazy; and a lot of that table just describes someone who's introverted or have poor social graces. 

Maybe there's something interesting in the stat-blocks? They have sunlight sensitivity and a magic resistance, something that most Underdark humanoids have. The Savant variant has sorcerer spells, I guess? I don't know. Dungeons & Dragons has a huge influx of very samey Underdark species, and with all of the depth that Tome of Foes gives to the Duergar, the Derro just feels... odd. 

Unlike something like the Grimlock, I don't really get the vibe that this really should be classified as a separate race from the Duergar, especially with their new backstory. It really is a shame, because 5th Edition has done a lot of great retooling that made boring older monsters feel like they get a nice new twist, but the Derro just doesn't have anything particularly interesting going for them beyond 'wacky crazy psycho dwarf!!!' At least playing up their madness in a way that emphasizes their paranoia would be something. Maybe they are aware of something that most normal people can't see. Maybe tie them to the Far Realm or something. Maybe tie it to the source material, where the Dero are meant to be 'robotic' in the sense that they follow a sort of programming. I don't know. Something to make them just Evil Dwarf Subrace #2.